Showing posts with label History in Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History in Art. Show all posts

Thursday, April 20, 2023

History of pewter


The blog of the Canadian Museum of History explores the history and artistry of Canadian, or more precisely, Quebec pewter-making. Jean-Francois Lozier delves into the career of Thomas Jean-Baptiste Menut, a nineteenth-century Montreal craftsman whose pewter spoons are valued by collectors of Canadiana, not just because of the fineness of their work but because he stamped his initials and "Montreal" on them, making them a lot more identifiable.  

Except his stamp was sometimes "TM" and sometimes IM. Part of the point of the blog post is to establish that TM and IM were one and the same person, not a father and son. Clearly, there is much basic research that can still be done in the history of Canadian crafts.

Friday, November 27, 2020

History of Art and Media: the Death of Wolfe in New York

 


If you are one of those who got the digital New York Times subscription as soon as the pandemic and the lockdown left you craving information -- or even if you've been a lifer there -- you may have noticed the Times' current story/display about Benjamin West's painting "The Death of Wolfe" (paywalled, I've no doubt).

The analysis may be somewhat familiar to anyone who's taken a Canadian art history class. But the Times package is still a pretty impressive demonstration of what online media can turn a newspaper story into: a collage of text and images that just flows up your screen.  

As far as I know, there's no particular hook or anniversary or current analogy behind the story; they just felt like doing it, I guess.  A little CanHist, done up elegantly in the Big Apple.

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

History of Canadian art... since time immemorial



A special show in conjunction with the opening of the National Gallery of Canada's new Canadian and Indigenous Galleries, from Time Immemorial to 1867, just ended in Ottawa. But the newly reorganized permanent exhibition remains.  I'm kinda loving that "salon" presentation, with scores of works mixed together against a colorful wall. (The Art Gallery of Ontario's 19th century Canadian collection uses a similar presentation).

I recently came across an account by the American science fiction writer Kim Stanley Robinson of a visit to a conference in Ottawa in the 1980s, during which he took in the National Gallery,
[I] went to the Europe floor and was really unimpressed. I was in the elevator leaving the building, thinking Poor Canada, so culturally deprived, they have even managed to acquire five bad van Goghs, maybe the five worst van Goghs of all -- when the elevator doors opened on the Canadian floor, revealing several giant canvases of the Group of Seven. I got out there and had one of the most visually stunning hours of my life.  I learned that Canada does not need van Goghs. 
And that was before the "new" National Gallery opened in 1988. I've had an experience like that with the National Gallery's Canadian spaces too -- some pretty terrific stuff there. This exhibit in which indigenous art is made central, women artists get their due, there is more photographic art, and new ideas in layout and presentation are attempted, sounds even better.

Hmm, who is gonna send a writer to Ottawa sometime soon?  

Wednesday, April 05, 2017

History of a National Portrait Gallery

Charlotte Gray (and Lawson Hunter, chairman of the Ottawa  Art Gallery) make the case for a National Portrait Gallery.


This is Salem Bland, a portrait by Lawren Harris. Bland is in the Art Gallery of Ontario, actually, but there are enough other great faces to fill a lot of walls

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Review: Mark Reynolds on a new study of how Tom Thomson died


Mark Reynolds, a Canadian now living in Chicago who has written for Canada's History and other publications, contributes this original review of The Many Deaths of Tom Thomson: Separating Fact from Fiction by Gregory Klages (Dundurn 2016)

The epitaph for Tom Thomson recorded in the Owen Sound parish where he was buried eulogized the painter as: “Talented and with many friends and no enemies, a mystery.”

In the days immediately after Thomson’s body was pulled out of Algonquin Park’s Canoe Lake the talent and friends were then not in doubt: his paintings had already begun to inspire the artists of the nascent Group of Seven. Major institutions, discerning collectors and dedicated patrons had already purchased some of his early works, and museums were already looking for more. His death in 1917 cut short a career that most observers agreed had the potential to transform the Canadian art world.

The enemies and mystery alluded to in the parish record is more easily explained by the churchman’s foresight than the facts as they were then understood. The official cause of death was drowning, caused in an accident. Nonetheless, in the decades since 1917, the tales around Thomson’s life and death in Canoe Lake have been transplanted from the historic record into the more fertile soil of Thomson’s legend, and have grown to accommodate and keep pace with the painter’s place in the national mythos. “Mystery” grew alongside it, its weeds generously fertilized by those determined to harvest its bounty.

Thomson’s legend - of the lone outdoorsman, at home in the wilds to which his art tried to honour - did not sit easily with an accidental drowning on a calm summer afternoon less than a kilometre from his bed. Misadventure - an awkward step on a rock, a careless encounter with a submerged log - could not bring down the man who had seen into the soul of the Canadian wild through “The Jack Pine” and captured “The West Wind.”

“The Many Deaths of Tom Thomson” began as “Death on a Painted Lake”, part of the Great Unsolved Mysteries in Canadian History archival website project. Klages is not pursuing a mystery however, or even really attempting to cast new light on Thomson’s death.

If there is a narrative present in the book, it is less about Tom Thomson and more about the historical record pertaining to Thomson. How his death attracted suspicion, which turned into speculation, which turned into rumour, which eventually turned into memory, which has assumed the stature of fact.

Klages' mission was to rip up this overgrowth of supposition away from the record, and then trace the vines and roots of each to disentangle them from the truth. As such, reading the book is less like reading a conventional history that it is akin to sitting in the jury while a very thorough prosecutor methodically, rigorously and uncompromisingly builds a case. No witness, no piece of evidence is left without having its credibility or provenance examined to the minutest degree.

The approach leads to a lot of repetition. Chapter after chapter the testimony of then-ranger Mark Robinson is called upon: first his journals, then his letters, then his lecture. The details of each are compared and contrasted. Each time any part of them is relied upon by later writers, either on their own or in combination with other witnesses, the process is repeated to a greater or lesser degree.

The repetition initially promised a tedious read. Like a prosecutor, though, Klages was establishing his facts, and making sure they were understood. The goal was not to tell a story, but to make his indictment. The aforementioned Robinson, whose apparent desire to attach himself to an interesting story led him to add flourishes to his tale unsupported by the facts, was an accessory. But the real targets of Klages’ prosecutorial zeal are other authors. Those subjected to Klages’ cross-examination include Blowden Davies, who first proposed Thomson’s murder in the 1930s; and William Little, whose determination to prove that Thomson was murdered led him to desecrate a grave in the 1960s and use that crime to sell a book.

Klages’ evisceration of one prominent Canadian journalist for his irresponsible output on Thomson was almost painful to read: the ruthlessness with which Klages reveals the speculation, sloppy research and unsupported family legend through which the author has polluted the public understanding of Thomson’s story was a tour de force of rigorous history over sensationalizing careerism.

In many ways, the thorough debunking of the peddlers of murder (and suicide) theories was the apex of the book, making the actual chapter on Thomson’s probable death a bit of an afterthought. A reader like me, having no previous investment in Thomson’s story other than the shared experience of having fallen out of a canoe in Algonquin Park, might nonetheless find Klages’ paring Thomson’s story down to its mundane truth intellectually gratifying. Better, the relentlessness with which Klages pursues only verifiable truths turned out to be emotionally compelling, in an unexpected way. The mundane likelihood that Thomson slipped disembarking from his canoe does not provide a dignified death for a man whose fame was tied to his expertise in the wild, but as Klages notes, “(w)hat Thomson is remembered for is the passion that gave his life meaning.” With this book, we should, 100 years later, finally be able to move on from his death.

With the fall book season looming, we hope to notice new and interesting histories in the coming months.  If you would consider reviewing for us, let me know -- and suggest potential titles or topic areas you might take up. We can provide reviewers with a book, this space, and our gratitude, not much more.

Monday, August 08, 2016

Lawren Harris at the AGO. And the current history of big Toronto institutions


Lake and Mountain (AGO website)

Went down to the Art Gallery of Ontario recently to see The Idea of North, the big Lawren Harris show, the one driven into existence by a Los Angeles gallery galvanized by actor Steve Martin's insistence that Harris is a great 20th century artist.

The AGO participated in the development of the exhibit, but the one showing in Toronto is quite different from the LA show.  Martin's interest is in masterpieces.  He's convinced that Harris's semi-abstract, semi-spiritual images of northern peaks and bergs are the vital and important part of his oeuvre, and the LA show, as best as I can tell from the AGO comments, concentrated on them entirely.

The AGO, however, has bookended the mountain spectaculars with two section on Harris's work in and on Toronto.  The first is largely his small images of houses and streetscapes in the rundown downtown neighbourhood called The Ward.  The second is more generally about his urban and architectural abstractions and their relations to Toronto.

In both these sections, the curatorial emphasis is quite different from the North image.  Where Martin is interested only is masterworks of art, the AGO is sociological and cultural.  It takes note of Harris's neglect of minorities in the Ward and of Inuit in the north, and juxtaposes his works against works by contemporary artists with different techniques and emphases.  Martin, one might guess, wouldn't give a damn about all that.  He's chasing the pantheon, not using art for social criticism.

We noticed, for what it is worth, that the Toronto sections of the exhibit, with many small paintings that repay close attention, seemed much more crowded than the central space with the large, austere Idea of North paintings.

We have been members of both the Art Gallery and the Royal Ontario Museum for years, and I cannot help comparing.  The AGO seems to have interesting programming all the time, very global in scope, but also distinctly engaged with Canada and with Toronto. (The Harris show followed a large Colville retrospective, and other Canadian work is frequently featured.). AGO shows always reflect smart, provocative curatorship.

Right now the ROM is featuring an exhibit on tattooing (from a French museum) and a show of Dale Chihuly's glassblowing craft, both of which seem unambitious, not much interested in connoisseurship, and conveying a feel that they were pushed forward by marketing departments rather than curators. I cannot remember when the ROM last had any interesting programming on a Canadian subject. The new director of the ROM is an American who built his reputation in raising funds from the (large, rich American) private sector.  He succeeds an Australian who did not stay long.  I think the ROM is in trouble.

The Idea of North is at the AGO until September 18.

Update, August 10:  My art historian friend disagrees about the AGO's curatorship. She thinks their context and presentation work on Harris is actually pretty lazy, and the AGO could have done much more to present Harris, who he was, and how his art practice evolved. Fair enough. But I've found myself in two or three conversations about the exhibit, and so far every Canadian agreed they found Harris's big northern paintings -- and Los Angeles's "idea of north" -- left them, well, a bit cold.

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

History of Beaver Hall


Prudence Heward, At the Theatre, 1928
Best thing we did over the Easter holiday -- leaving aside the roast lamb, mmm -- was going to the Art Gallery of Hamilton's Beaver Hall Group show, entitled "1920s Modernism in Montreal."  It was developed by the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts and is now touring to the AGH, the Art Gallery of Windsor and the Glenbow in Calgary.

Mostly, you have never seen these paintings before. Most of the works in this show have been in private collections since they were painted, and the scholarship on them has been so limited that even the list of Beaver Hall members remains incomplete. Some active members have zero paintings for which the ownership and location is known today.

The Beaver Hall Group were a network of Montreal artists, as many women as men. They came together by renting joint studio space on Beaver Hall Hill in 1920, though they also shared common teachers and loosely similar artistic agendas.  While the Group of Seven -- A.Y. Jackson managed to be a member of both groups -- were reinventing landscape painting and North Canadian imagery in Toronto, the Beaver Hall group mostly painted urban scenes and nudes and luminous portraits. Even their landscapes generally have a portrait in them.  They are a very downtown bunch. We're not in north Algoma anymore.

So much for their history.  The thing is, their paintings are terrific.  Back then somebody sneered at them as jazz painters, and you can see the idea: jangly angles, bright stabs of colour, mixtures of abstraction and realism. And the portraits, jazz painting or not, are terrific, particularly Lilias Torrence Newton's and Edwin Holgate's.

If you can't see it, CBC Radio did a lively doc on the painters and the exhibition in February, still available online.

I was thinking about seeking a review copy of the catalogue, a handsome volume created by the Montreal curators.  But the book is published by some press in England, and it hardly seems worth the effort.  What's up with that, Canadian publishing?

Monday, December 16, 2013

History of military costume art


Charlevoix salutes the life and work of Eugene Leliepvre, official military artist of the French army since 1951 and also the pre-eminent illustrator of the French colonial military in North America.  As Charlevoix says:
son œuvre a alimenté d'une façon inestimable l'image qu'on se fait aujourd'hui de la Nouvelle-France. Vous avez tous croisé et apprécié de ses illustrations, j'en suis certain.
True, that. I'd seen these forever and never had a clue who Leliepvre was. At his death last month, Leliepvre was 106.

(Image: Ensigne et sergent des troupes de la Marine, From Parks Canada via Charlevoix)
 
Follow @CmedMoore