"The Ford government wants sewer pipes that send raw waste into Lake Ontario to be diverted into a channel used by swimmers and rowers, the Star has learned."
-- Toronto Star, October 9, 2024, page 1.
 |
| The Cundill finalists for 2024 |
I caught your blog post and laughed out loud at this line: “…it has a couple of issue- oriented books, though nothing that would count as history (again).”
It’s sooo discouraging.
It’s a bit different on the French side, and I’m not sure why. Different juries, I guess.]
Strangely, the GGbooks website presents cover photos of the nominated titles, but no description or jury statements about why they were nominated, nothing about the authors at all, no links. Three PenguinRandom titles, two from indie Canadian presses. On a quick glance, Winipek and The Age of Insecurity (the 2023 Massey Lectures) look substantial, but it's a literary prize: here's hoping the jurors have been assessing on that basis.
Two of the books use that lazy trope "the age of ....[fill in the blank]" but that might be on the publishers. Congratulations to all the nominees,
Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia by Gary J. Bass – A landmark history of the post-World War II trials of Japan’s leaders as war criminals, which has shaped relationships throughout modern Asia.
Native Nations: A Millennium in North America by Kathleen DuVal – A sweeping 1000-year history of the power of Indigenous North America, from ancient cities to fights for sovereignty that continue today.
Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights by Dylan C. Penningroth – Stretching from the last decades of slavery to the 1970s, Before the Movement is an account of Black legal lives that looks beyond the Constitution and the criminal justice system, to recover a rich, broader vision of Black life.
Readers here will know this is not a political blog. But the day deserves attention
Has this been the worst year ever for news from the Middle East? Not that there have been a lot of good years for a long time.
Lately I have heard more people alluding to Ireland and the Troubles to deal with current events. There was another forever war, two sides seemingly prepared to go on killing each other pretty much forever.
And then it burned out. That particular generation of stone killers seemed to age out. And they failed to bring on another generation to succeed them. Given an option of (mostly) peace and (some) prosperity, people on both sides seemed ready to grasp it.
Could that happen in the Middle East? I rather think the Israeli population could accept it pretty quickly, and could dispose of those in government who might want to keep fighting wars they think they will not lose. It's pretty clear the United States, principal guarantors of Israeli strength, would be happy enough to see all that happen.
The other side? I can believe there are lots of people willing to live without endless war, without absolute victory or vengeance. But the decision-makers on that side seem absolutely committed to victory and vengeance, however remote the prospect of achieving it -- and they are not accountable to the people they lead. Steps to peace in the Middle East before the collapse of the Iranian state that sustains the war? Hard to imagine.
And the crisis is not just in the Middle East any more. We have Islamophobes among us, for sure, and mostly we identify them and isolate them as fanatics if not psychopaths. But the surge in anti-Jewish attacks in Canada and other western countries, and the seeming righteousness that underlies it, seems new. Do our neighbours really think that chanting "From the river to the sea" might lead to an acceptable settlement anywhere?
Probably not the TFC guy (right) winning this year
Can you be a sports fan and be content that your team is out of contention? Maybe you can.
I was a fervent supporter of the Canadiens around the time that the Toronto Maple Leafs were winning Stanley Cups by beating them. Then I grew up. Since then I've been a pretty casual sports watcher, not much invested in winners and losers. It would be fun in Toronto if the Leafs won a championship again. But I can wait, you know. I do follow the Tour de France and to root for the Canadians in it, but I follow the show more than sweat over who may win.
A few years ago, to my own surprise I did drifted into watching soccer regularly, occasionally at the stadium, more often on television. Soccer has two big attractions for me. The pace is such that you can actually follow it, and after a while one begins to see how teams develop their attack and plan their attack. The strategy can be comprehended -- and observed as it plays out. The other thing: unlike hockey and football, at least, you can follow a team and quickly find that all the individual players are bareheaded and can actually be identified and followed. Also you can see them play live without taking out a mortgage for the tickets, and the crowds are small enough to make it kinda homey.
So I've become a Toronto FC supporter. If you are going to follow a team, it might as well be your hometown team. Happily, I got into this just as they became the best team in the league and brought home all the trophies.
They don't do that now.
Watching TFC means watching them lose... a lot. In the last week or two, they desperately tried to win one or two games to clinch, not even a real playoff spot, but a chance to join a "play-in" to determine the final entrants to the real playoffs. I felt for them every time they controlled a game and failed to score. Or got blown out. Or blew a lead by starting fights and getting their stars thrown out of the game.
If they somehow qualified, they were going to be eliminated fast They really did not look like a playoff team. So what the hell, why pollute the real competition.
I'm not much disappointed that their last loss -- allowing a goal in the dying moments of extra time after dominating Inter Miami for most of the game -- eliminated them and ended their season before the playoffs started. They ought to be out. They ought to start improving the team now, not in another month or so.
I hope enough of them get to stay around that when next season starts, I can still identify most of their players on the field. Meanwhile I'd do something else Saturday nights.
 |
| Borealia's canoe: out of the water for a while |
Borealia, the Early Canadian History blog from (but not exclusively about) Atlantic Canada, has announced a sabbatical. For the time being, I've deleted it from the list of History Blogs at right. The editors say:
It has now been almost a decade since Borealia was launched with the intention of amplifying scholarship on northern North America before the twentieth century. We hoped it would be a forum where historians of different sub-fields could make connections, and to bring this great work to educators, non-specialists, and an interested general readership. We are grateful for the community of contributors and readers who have encouraged us and made this a worthwhile venture.
Much has changed in the landscape of digital scholarship and social media since 2015, yet we remain convinced of the ongoing value of an online forum of the sort Borealia aspires to be.
But ten years is a long time, and for a variety of entirely normal professional and personal reasons, we need a break. We have decided to take a year-long sabbatical, until summer 2025.
Well, I can understand all that. Best wishes to all who have served -- and may again!
Most of the sites listed at the left have been been going quite a while, but all still seem to be active -- and I do use my own links to look around from time to time.
Podcasts have been the new blogs for quite some time now. So my list is now titled "History Sites of Note", not History Blogs, and I'm about to add to the list a few history-centered podcasting sites. (Update, October 4: Additions now started.)
occasions when crowds gathered in the streets of Toronto to demonstrate, contest, or celebrate. Vividly written and richly researched, his accounts include rowdy election days, beleaguered religious processions, rallies for troops who subdued the North-West Resistance, Street Railway Company strikes, and Viceregal and Royal visits.
Still, a lively mix of stories in the issue, for sure. Canada's first chess grandmaster Abe Yanovsky of Winnipeg. The sinking of a Canadian troopship off Singapore. The profound and lasting significance of the Treaty of Niagara 1764. Surveying the Canada-US border, with copious maps. And a cover story on the prairie tipi. A note on a new play in Halifax about Rocky Jones, Afro-Canadian activist and historian. Letters about lighthouses. Nothing from me in this issue, but looking for great things from Jackie Kovacs and her team. Stay tuned. And subscribe, like ya oughta.
Okay, Rogers probably won't lose money on the deal. There will always be another egomaniacal billionaire ready to push up the price of sports franchises. But I was recently reading a lively business history, Rogers v Rogers: The Battle for Control of Canada's Telecom Empire by Alexandra Posadzki. It doesn't inspire confidence in MLSE's new owner, Edward Rogers.
Posadzki describes how Ed Rogers managed to defeat his mother and sisters to become uncontested head of the Rogers empire -- and to fire a seemingly capable CEO who had disagreed with him once too often on big plans for Rogers' telecom businesses. But in the process she makes it pretty clear that Rogers' main qualification is being the founders' eldest son.
Sources in her book suggest Rogers Jr. been a bean counter more than a visionary, insecure and combative, and too often inclined to strangle telecom innovations at Rogers the moment they became expensive. The chances of him driving away strong and effective management at the sports teams while failing to negotiate the endlessly changing market for sports media are, shall we say, non-zero. And while he plays sportsman, who minds the store at Rogers? Meanwhile, the cost of purchasing Shaw Media in order to further concentrate the Canadian TV/internet market remains immense.
I don't know if Bell is particularly well managed, but at least it is managed by professionals, not family members. Maybe it has made a smart decision to take Rogers' cash, strengthen its own financial situation, and focus on telecom and media rather than chase the pricy glamour of sports franchises.
The Leafs lost last night, and Toronto FC the night before. The Blue Jays (he owns them too) lose constantly, and Ed Rogers thinks the Argos are minor league and pines for that NFL franchise to shore up his ego.
Judy Stoffman in the Globe and Mail provides a detailed obituary of Maria Tippett, and places her (accurately I think) as a pioneer of academic cultural history of Canada.
She led a charmed life, living part of the year in Cambridge, England, where she was a senior research fellow at Churchill College, married to the Cambridge historian Peter Clarke, the master of Trinity Hall.
During the summer months, they would return to British Columbia – at first to Bowen Island then later to South Pender, one of B.C.’s idyllic Gulf Islands. There she and her husband began their day at 7:30 a.m. at their writing desks, then discussed what they had written in the afternoon.
Nature reports on a DNA study that seems to confirm that the people of Rapa Nui (aka Easter Island) had significant contacts with people of South American ancestry around the 14th Century CE, long before any Europeans beyond the Norse had visited either the Americas or the Pacific.
The likelihood had been suggested before: what about those (Asian) chicken bones found in South America or those (American) sweet potatoes on Rapa Nui? And it seems at least plausible that the Polynesians, having explored the whole Pacific Ocean, had not covered the last gap, bringing them to American coasts. But this seems the most persuasive evidence.
Apparently the same ancient DNA suggests that Rapa Nui never suffered a precontact over-population and collapse as previously hypothesized -- and taken up at length in Jared Diamond's Collapse.
World History Two
Serious history on a podcast? Sure. Listen to William Dalrymple describe on the Empire podcast how India practically colonized the Roman empire once Rome occupied Egypt and opened a Red Sea route for India-Rome sea trades. He argues persuasively that the value of products that India delivered to Rome in and after the time of Augustus Caesar was far larger than all the tribute Rome extracted from Gaul. All those lions, tigers, and elephants in the Colosseum? Just a minor byproduct of India's massive exports to Rome -- and of Rome's export of mucho gold to India in return.
Dalrymple's larger point is an argument that India's economic and cultural empire in early times has been seriously overshadowed by China's reputation for wealth and influence. And Rome was only one market for India; a much larger one existed in south-east Asia, which is why you can visit the sites of ancient Hindu and Buddhist monuments from Thailand and Java.
A key Dalrymple objective: to suggest a reassessment of the Silk Road story, which sometimes seems to presume that all ancient trade had to be overland rather than seaborne. -- and that China was therefore the source of all that was traded.
Besides the podcast chat, the full argument comes out in Dalrymple's new book The Golden Road, just published in the U.K. (reviewed here in the Guardian).
Elegant medal, too.
WE thought we were there to see a new exhibit about -- who knew -- Impressionism on the St. Lawrence. But I was pleased and impressed to see a special exhibit there on the (pre-Group of Seven) war art of A.Y. Jackson. And that it was guest curated by the historian Douglas Hunter -- because the whole idea of the exhibition grows out of Hunter's recent biography Jackson's Wars -- an immensely detailed and very readable immersion into what the First World War experience meant to Jackson, and by extension to his whole generation.
Good to know we still have large public galleries fleet-footed and alert enough to pick up on what's going on out there and responding so rapidly and effectively -- to a book!
Small grumble on the theme of war art: Years ago I was one of many historians who were invited to review and comment on exhibition plans for the new and then-developing Canadian War Museum. One large reservation I recall expressing rather vigorously was that the plans did not make room for substantial space within the museum dedicated to ongoing exhibitions from the truly remarkable holding of Canadian war art that it has.
Back then, the suggestion got about as much attention as most such exercises do. At the moment, I would guess, the McMichael has more war art on its walls than the War Museum does. (Though I have not been to Ottawa or the War Museum in some time, and things may have changed.)
"River of Dreams" the Impressionism/St.Lawrence show we thought we were going to see, is pretty terrific too, and much more extensively than "Jackson's Wars."