Who could say No to that? |
The referendum question was a simple Yes/No -- attractive compared to the Canadian style of "Do you want to consider potentially giving a possible mandate to tentatively negotiate...." But it prevented debate on avenues for change and reform as part of the process. As usual, those who set the question shape the terms of debate and the outcome.
As usual with referenda, the Irish debate encouraged maximalist demagogery, with the No side conjuring up an executive power grab if the Seanad were gone, and the Yes side just as extreme about elitist, unelected, autocratic blah-blah-blah.
Whatever Canada does about our Senate, I hope we have as little as possible to do with referenda. If enough provincial legislaturs will line up, pass a simple statute, override or pack the senate, and just do it.