Hell, it's only a thirtieth -- "What's that, the enamel anniversary or something?" And who needs the government to tell us about historical significance.
Still, it's a deliberate choice about what history matters and what doesn/t. Was it calculation -- a cheap bone to throw to the Trudeau-hating, rights-doubting, court-abusing "base?"
Or is it true feeling? It sometimes seems Mr Harper really does fear and resent any good thing done if it was done by the other guys. If the other guys got some mileage out of Canadian pride and patriotism, then the new regime has to be against Canadian pride.
Or is it true feeling? It sometimes seems Mr Harper really does fear and resent any good thing done if it was done by the other guys. If the other guys got some mileage out of Canadian pride and patriotism, then the new regime has to be against Canadian pride.
Insisting on making Canadian achievements into partisan talismans... you can't say seems that smart. the Charter may be around a while.
Update: Brian Busby notes another anniversary:
Lost in all the hoopla about the Charter is the fact that today marks the 120th anniversary of the passing of our first Liberal prime minister:
Thought you both might enjoy this silly attack on the man by one of the Four Jameses:
Mean Mister MacDonald Attacks a Prime Minister